Biotechnology

Biosensors: The Race for a Rapid Test Against African Swine Fever

A silent pandemic sweeping through global pig populations has scientists turning to nanotechnology and gene-editing technology to fight back.

Reading time: 8 min
November 13, 2023

Imagine a disease so lethal it can wipe out nearly every pig it infects, collapsing local pork industries and causing billions in economic damage. This is the grim reality of African Swine Fever (ASF), a highly contagious viral disease that has been spreading across the globe. With no effective vaccine or treatment available, the key to containment lies in one critical factor: speed.

The current gold-standard tests are accurate but require centralized laboratories, taking hours or even days. In the crucial window of waiting, the virus can spread uncontrollably. This article explores the revolutionary world of biosensors—cutting-edge, rapid detection technologies being developed to bring the lab directly to the field, offering a powerful new weapon in the fight against ASF.

Why a Rapid Test is a Game-Changer

First identified in Kenya in 1921, African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) is a devastating pathogen that causes high fever, internal bleeding, and mortality rates approaching 100% in domestic pigs 1 2 . While it poses no threat to human health, its impact on food security and livelihoods is profound.

100%

Mortality rate in domestic pigs

$20M+

Losses in China within two months (2017 outbreak) 1

$15B

US pork industry at risk if ASFV is introduced 1

"ASFV is very important right now because it is already a deadly disease in other countries, and it can kill pigs quickly, usually within 7 to 10 days. For field surveillance, if we have a portable device, we can take it to the field, and quickly detect ASFV-infected pigs. In this way, we can immediately apply the control and prevention measures."

Professor Ying Fang, pathobiology expert at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign 4

What is a Biosensor?

At its core, a biosensor is a compact analytical device that combines a biological detection element with a sensor that translates a biological response into a measurable signal.

Biological Receptor

The "lock" designed to specifically recognize and bind to the ASFV virus (the "key"), whether it's a piece of its genetic code or a viral protein.

Transducer

A signal reporter that produces an output—like a color change, an electrical current, or a fluorescent glow—that we can easily see or measure 1 .

The State of the Art: A Spectrum of New Strategies

Researchers are exploring a dazzling array of biosensor strategies, each with unique advantages. The common goal driving all these platforms is to achieve the "triple crown" of disease diagnostics: rapid (under 30 minutes), sensitive (rivaling PCR), and specific (no false positives) testing in a portable, user-friendly format.

Technology Target Key Feature Reported Sensitivity Assay Time
CRISPR-Cas12a 1 8 Viral DNA (p72, DNA Pol) Uses gene-editing protein for ultra-specific detection; can be combined with lateral flow strips. As low as 5 copies/μL 1 ~25 minutes 1
Gold Nanoparticle (GNP) 2 Viral DNA (p72 gene) Colorimetric change; easy to interpret, low-cost, and portable. 550 copies 2 5 minutes 2
Lateral Flow Biosensor (LFB) 6 Viral DNA (B646L gene) Similar to a pregnancy test; uses gold nanoparticles for visual readout. 200 copies/reaction 6 ~30 minutes 6
Photoelectrochemical (PEC) 3 Viral DNA Uses light to generate an electrical signal; offers very high sensitivity. Ultra-high (specific data in research) 3 Varies
Nanoplasmonic Sensor 1 Viral Protein (p30) Detects antibodies in serum; useful for confirming exposure. 0.78 ng/mL 1 <15 minutes 1

Comparison of Biosensor Performance Metrics

A Closer Look: The Gold Nanoparticle Experiment

To understand how a biosensor moves from concept to reality, let's examine a recent proof-of-concept experiment for a gold nanoparticle (GNP)-based biosensor targeting ASFV.

The Objective

Researchers aimed to design a simple, colorimetric test that could detect a conserved region of the ASFV's p72 gene with high sensitivity and specificity across multiple virus genotypes 2 5 .

The Methodology, Step-by-Step

Probe Design

Eight different oligonucleotide probes were designed to bind to the p72 gene. Using computational tools, the researchers first analyzed how well each probe would "stick" to diverse ASFV genotypes to ensure broad detection coverage 2 .

Nanoparticle Preparation

Gold nanoparticles were synthesized. Their unique property is that they change color from red to blue when they aggregate (clump together), providing a visual signal 2 .

Functionalization

The nanoparticles were coated with a chemical layer and then attached to the designed DNA probes 2 .

The Test

When a sample containing the target ASFV DNA is added, the viral DNA binds to the probe on the nanoparticles, causing them to aggregate and change the solution's color. If no target is present, the color remains red 2 .

The Results and Analysis

The experiment successfully identified two optimal probes that provided the strongest performance. The biosensor could detect as few as 550 copies of synthetic ASFV DNA in just 5 minutes 2 . Furthermore, it showed no cross-reactivity when tested with common barnyard bacteria like E. coli and Salmonella, confirming its high specificity 2 .

Statistical analysis revealed that the probe's GC content (the proportion of Guanine and Cytosine nucleotides) was significantly associated with detection sensitivity, providing a valuable design rule for future biosensors 2 5 . This study beautifully illustrates how in-silico (computer-based) design and experimental validation can work hand-in-hand to advance diagnostic technology.

Probe Length (bp) GC Content Sensitivity (DNA copies) Cross-Reactivity
Probe 2 40 bp 50.0% 550 None detected
Probe 5 60 bp 54.2% 550 None detected

Impact of GC Content on Detection Sensitivity

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents for ASFV Biosensors

Developing these advanced diagnostics requires a suite of specialized tools. The table below details some of the key reagents and their roles in the biosensor ecosystem.

Reagent / Material Function in the Experiment Example Use Case
Oligonucleotide Probes 2 The molecular "hooks" that specifically bind to and recognize the ASFV target sequence (DNA or RNA). Designed to target conserved viral genes like p72 (B646L) or p30 (CP204L) 1 2 .
Biological Receptors (Antibodies) 1 Proteins that recognize and bind to specific viral antigens (e.g., p30, p72, VP73 proteins). Used in Lateral Flow Immunoassays (LFIAs) for rapid protein detection 1 .
CRISPR-crRNA 8 A guide RNA that directs the Cas12a enzyme to a specific ASFV DNA sequence, activating its collateral cleavage activity. Enables ultra-specific detection in CRISPR-Cas systems; crRNAs targeting DNA Pol or pp220 genes have shown high robustness 8 .
Gold Nanoparticles (GNPs) 2 6 Act as signal transducers; their aggregation or binding event causes a visible color change, making detection easy. Functionalized with DNA probes or streptavidin for colorimetric readout in lateral flow strips or solution-based assays 2 6 .
Isothermal Amplification Reagents 6 8 Enzymes and buffers that amplify tiny amounts of viral DNA to detectable levels at a single temperature (no need for a thermal cycler). Used in RPA (Recombinase Polymerase Amplification) or MCDA (Multiple Cross Displacement Amplification) to boost sensitivity before detection 6 8 .
Reporter Molecules (FAM/Biotin) 6 Small molecules attached to DNA amplicons. FAM is a fluorescent tag, and Biotin binds tightly to Streptavidin. Used together in lateral flow biosensors to capture and visualize the amplified product on a test line 6 .
ManiladiolBench Chemicals
12-Ketooleic acidBench Chemicals
Blankophor BHCBench Chemicals
Oxime VBench Chemicals
VobasanBench Chemicals

Reagent Usage Frequency in ASFV Biosensors

Detection Time vs. Sensitivity

The Road Ahead: From Lab Bench to Pig Pen

Despite the exciting progress, the journey from a successful proof-of-concept to a commercially available, farmer-ready test is fraught with challenges. A recent review of 41 ASFV biosensors reported between 2014 and 2025 highlights that many of these devices remain at an early stage 1 . There is a significant lack of large-scale field validation, and many prototypes have only been trialed in controlled laboratory settings 1 .

Key Challenges

Standardization
Real-World Testing
Cost-Effectiveness

Interdisciplinary Solutions

To address these gaps, interdisciplinary teams are forming. For instance, at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, a collaboration between engineering and veterinary medicine, supported by a USDA grant, aims to develop sensitive, low-cost, and portable point-of-use biosensors 4 .

Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

Engineering, veterinary science, and biotechnology experts working together

Conclusion

The global fight against African Swine Fever is at a critical juncture. While the threat is immense, the scientific response is equally powerful. The rapid evolution of biosensor technology, from clever nanoparticle systems to sophisticated CRISPR-based paper tests, represents a beacon of hope.

These tools promise to transform disease management, empowering farmers and veterinarians to detect ASFV outbreaks in real-time, right at the farm gate. By moving diagnostics out of the central lab and into the field, biosensors are poised to become an indispensable shield, safeguarding animal health, global food supplies, and the economic stability of rural communities worldwide.

References

References would be listed here in the appropriate format.

References