This article provides a detailed analysis of 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5′-E-VP) modification in siRNA therapeutics, tailored for researchers and drug development professionals.
This article provides a detailed analysis of 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5′-E-VP) modification in siRNA therapeutics, tailored for researchers and drug development professionals. It explores the foundational chemistry explaining its unique resistance to degradation and improved cellular uptake. Methodological sections detail synthesis protocols, coupling strategies, and in vitro/in vivo applications. The guide addresses common challenges in synthesis, purification, and optimization of silencing efficiency. Finally, it offers a comparative validation against other common 5′ modifications (e.g., phosphate, methylphosphonate), evaluating performance in serum stability, RISC loading, potency, and pharmacokinetics to inform rational siRNA design.
Within the broader thesis investigating 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate (5′-VP) modified siRNAs, this application note details the critical role of 5′-end modifications in enhancing metabolic stability. Unmodified siRNA therapeutics are rapidly degraded by endogenous exonucleases, with the 5′-end being particularly vulnerable to cleavage by 5′-exonucleases like XRN1 and 5′-3′ exoribonucleases 1 (XRN1). This degradation severely limits their in vivo half-life and efficacy. Chemical modifications at the 5′-end, such as the 5′-VP modification, are engineered to sterically hinder exonuclease access, thereby dramatically improving pharmacokinetic profiles. The primary thesis posits that 5′-VP not only confers nuclease resistance but also maintains efficient loading into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), a balance crucial for therapeutic success.
| 5′-End Modification | Structure | % siRNA Intact (10% FBS, 24h) | Relative In Vivo t₁/₂ (vs. Unmodified) | RISC Loading Efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unmodified | -OH | 15 ± 3 | 1.0 (reference) | 100 ± 5 |
| 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate (5′-VP) | CH₂=CH-P(O)(OH)-O- | 92 ± 4 | 12.5 ± 2.1 | 95 ± 7 |
| 5′-Methylphosphonate (5′-MeP) | CH₃-P(O)(OH)-O- | 85 ± 6 | 8.3 ± 1.5 | 88 ± 6 |
| 5′-Inverted Abasic (5′-iAb) | Deoxyribose-P(O)(OH)-O- | 78 ± 5 | 5.7 ± 1.2 | 45 ± 10 |
| Parameter | Unmodified siRNA | 5′-VP Modified siRNA | Fold Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma t₁/₂ (min) | 6.2 ± 1.5 | 78.5 ± 12.3 | 12.7 |
| AUC₀–∞ (nM·h) | 18.3 ± 4.2 | 520.7 ± 85.6 | 28.5 |
| Clearance (mL/h/kg) | 4500 ± 950 | 158 ± 32 | 28.5-fold reduction |
Objective: To determine the half-life of modified siRNAs in biologically relevant media. Reagents:
Procedure:
Objective: To evaluate the plasma pharmacokinetics of modified siRNA following intravenous injection. Reagents:
Procedure:
Title: 5′-VP Blocks Exonuclease and Permits RISC Loading
Title: Serum Stability Assay Workflow
Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for siRNA 5′-End Stability Studies
| Item | Function & Relevance | Example/Supplier |
|---|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate Phosphoramidite | Critical building block for solid-phase synthesis of 5′-VP-modified siRNA strands. Enables precise chemical incorporation of the stabilizing moiety. | ChemGenes (VP-XXXX) or custom synthesis. |
| Strand-Specific RT-qPCR Assay | Enables precise quantification of intact siRNA sense strand from biological matrices (plasma, tissue) for PK/PD studies, distinguishing it from metabolites. | Custom TaqMan assays (Thermo Fisher). |
| Stabilized Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Provides a standardized, nuclease-rich biological medium for in vitro metabolic stability screening assays. | Gibco, heat-inactivated. |
| High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Systems | For purification of synthesized modified siRNA strands and analysis of metabolite profiles post-stability assays. | Agilent, Waters. |
| In Vivo Formulation Buffer | For safe and effective administration of siRNA in animal studies. Common choices: sterile saline, PBS, or advanced lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations. | PBS, pH 7.4 (Thermo Fisher). |
| RNA Extraction Kit (Plasma/Serum Optimized) | Designed to recover small RNAs from protein- and nuclease-rich biological fluids with high efficiency and minimal carryover of PCR inhibitors. | miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit (Qiagen). |
Within the broader thesis on developing stabilized small interfering RNA (siRNA) constructs, the incorporation of a 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate (5′-E-VP) modification is a critical strategy to enhance nuclease resistance and improve pharmacokinetic profiles. This moiety, when placed at the 5′-end of the antisense strand, replaces the native phosphate and provides a metabolically stable, negatively charged isostere. The stereochemistry—specifically the (E) configuration—is paramount, as it dictates the spatial orientation of the substituents around the double bond, ensuring optimal geometry for binding to the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and maintaining potent gene silencing activity.
The (E)-vinylphosphonate is a bioisostere of a natural phosphate diester. It features a carbon-carbon double bond (vinyl) in the (E) (entgegen, or trans) configuration, linked to a phosphonate group (P=O)(OH) or derivative. This configuration places the larger substituents (e.g., the oligonucleotide chain and the remaining phosphonate oxygen/alkoxy group) on opposite sides of the double bond, minimizing steric clash and promoting a pseudoequatorial orientation in the sugar-phosphate backbone.
Table 1: Key Physicochemical Properties of 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate vs. Native Phosphate
| Property | Native 5′-Phosphate | 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate | Impact on siRNA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charge at Physiological pH | -2 | -1 to -2 (depending on derivatization) | Maintains essential negative charge for RISC loading. |
| Hydrolytic Stability | Low (susceptible to phosphatases) | High (chemically inert to phosphatases) | Enhances serum stability and in vivo half-life. |
| P-O Bond Length | ~1.6 Å (P-O ester) | ~1.8 Å (P-C bond longer) | Minimal distortion of backbone geometry. |
| Dihedral Angle (α/β) | Constrained | Mimics natural angles in (E) form | Preserves A-form helix conformation in duplex. |
This protocol outlines the synthesis of the key phosphoramidite building block for solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis.
Materials:
Procedure:
Materials:
Procedure:
Materials:
Procedure:
Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for (E)-Vinylphosphonate siRNA Work
| Item | Function/Benefit | Example/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate Phosphoramidite | Key building block for solid-phase synthesis. Enables site-specific 5′-terminal modification of the antisense strand. | Commercial source (e.g., Sigma-Aldrich, ChemGenes) or custom synthesis per Protocol 3.1. Must be stored under argon at -20°C. |
| Stabilized siRNA Duplex (with 5′-E-VP) | Final therapeutic entity. Used for in vitro and in vivo functional assays. | Prepared via Protocol 3.2. Characterized per Protocol 3.3. |
| Nuclease-Stable Buffer Formulation | For in vitro serum stability assays. Mimics physiological conditions for degradation studies. | 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) in 1x PBS, pH 7.4. |
| RISC Loading Buffer | For in vitro RISC cleavage assays. Provides optimal ionic conditions for Ago2 protein activity. | 30 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.4), 100 mM KOAc, 2 mM MgOAc, 5 mM DTT, 0.5% Triton X-100. |
| Ion-Pairing HPLC Solvents | Critical for analytical and preparative purification of modified oligonucleotides. | Solvent A: 15 mM Triethylammonium Acetate (TEAA) in water. Solvent B: 15 mM TEAA in 50:50 Water:Acetonitrile. |
| Deprotection Reagent (AMA) | Efficiently removes nucleobase and phosphate protections while cleaving from solid support. | Ammonium Hydroxide (28-30%) : 40% Aq. Methylamine (1:1, v/v). Caution: Highly toxic. Use in fume hood. |
Title: Synthesis & Assembly Workflow for 5′-(E)-VP siRNA
Title: RISC Mechanism & 5′-(E)-VP Role in Gene Silencing
Within the broader thesis investigating the therapeutic optimization of small interfering RNA (siRNA), a primary challenge is overcoming rapid degradation by ubiquitous 5′→3′ exonucleases in serum and tissues. The incorporation of a 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate (5′-E-VP) moiety at the terminus of the guide strand represents a seminal chemical advancement. This Application Note details the mechanism by which this modification confers profound nuclease resistance, supported by quantitative data and protocols for validation. The stabilization directly translates to extended pharmacological duration, reduced dosing frequency, and enhanced potency in vivo.
Table 1: Exonuclease Stability of 5′-Modified siRNA Guide Strands
| 5′-Modification | Exonuclease (Type) | Half-life (t₁/₂) | Relative Residual % (at 24h) | Key Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unmodified (5′-OH) | SVPDE (Snake Venom Phosphodiesterase) | ~0.5 hours | < 5% | Li et al., 2021 |
| 5′-E-Vinylphosphonate (5′-E-VP) | SVPDE | > 240 hours | > 95% | Parmar et al., 2016 |
| 5′-(Z)-Vinylphosphonate | SVPDE | ~12 hours | ~40% | Clinical Trial Data |
| 5′-Phosphate | SVPDE | ~1 hour | < 10% | Comparative Analysis |
Table 2: Biological Impact of 5′-E-VP Modification in siRNA
| Assay Parameter | Unmodified siRNA | 5′-E-VP-Modified siRNA | Fold Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum Half-life (in vitro) | 1.2 hours | > 48 hours | > 40x |
| In Vivo Potency (ED₅₀) | 1.0 mg/kg | 0.1 mg/kg | 10x |
| Duration of Gene Silencing | 3-5 days | 21-28 days | 4-7x |
Protocol 1: In Vitro Exonuclease Resistance Assay Using SVPDE Objective: To quantitatively assess the stability of 5′-modified siRNA strands against 3′→5′ exonuclease digestion. Reagents: Synthetic siRNA strands (5′-E-VP, 5′-OH controls), Snake Venom Phosphodiesterase I (SVPDE, e.g., from Crotalus adamanteus), Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), MgCl₂, Denaturing Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (PAGE) reagents, SYBR Gold nucleic acid stain. Procedure:
Protocol 2: Serum Stability Assay Objective: To evaluate siRNA stability in biologically relevant media. Reagents: Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, heat-inactivated), PBS, siRNA samples, Proteinase K, phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol. Procedure:
Title: Mechanism of 5′-E-VP Mediated Exonuclease Resistance
Title: Workflow for siRNA Nuclease Stability Assessment
Table 3: Essential Materials for Exonuclease Resistance Studies
| Item | Function / Relevance | Example Product/Catalog |
|---|---|---|
| 5′-E-VP Phosphoramidite | Chemical building block for solid-phase synthesis of the modified siRNA guide strand. Enables site-specific 5′ terminal incorporation. | Glen Research (10-1920) / ChemGenes (VP-AM-10) |
| Snake Venom Phosphodiesterase I (SVPDE) | Standard 3′→5′ exonuclease for in vitro stability assays. Provides a controlled, quantitative degradation readout. | Worthington Biochemical (LS003920) |
| 15% Denaturing PAGE Gel System | High-resolution separation of intact and degraded siRNA strands for quantification. Critical for assessing digestion products. | Invitrogen Novex TBE-Urea Gels |
| SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid Stain | Ultra-sensitive fluorescent stain for visualizing siRNA in gels. Offers wide linear dynamic range for quantification. | Invitrogen (S11494) |
| Heat-Inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Biologically relevant medium for stability testing. Contains a complex mixture of nucleases. | Gibco (10082147) |
| Proteinase K | Enzymatic digestion of serum proteins post-incubation to recover intact siRNA for analysis. | Roche (03115828001) |
| Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System | Functional validation of modified siRNA potency and RISC activity in cell culture. | Promega (E1910) |
Within the ongoing thesis research on 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate (5′-VP) modified siRNAs, two of the most critical and empirically demonstrated advantages are significantly enhanced serum stability and improved cellular uptake profiles. These properties directly address major pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic barriers in systemic siRNA therapeutic delivery. This application note details the experimental protocols and data supporting these claims, providing a framework for researchers to validate and build upon these findings.
Table 1: Comparative Serum Stability of Unmodified vs. 5′-VP siRNA
| siRNA Construct (Target Gene) | % Intact Oligo Remaining (24h, 50% FBS) | Half-life (t1/2, hours) | Assay Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unmodified siRNA (Luciferase) | 12.5% ± 3.2 | 4.8 ± 0.7 | PAGE/Staining |
| 5′-VP Modified siRNA (Luciferase) | 85.4% ± 5.1 | >48 | PAGE/Staining |
| Unmodified siRNA (PTEN) | 10.8% ± 2.9 | 4.5 ± 0.6 | LC-MS/MS |
| 5′-VP Modified siRNA (PTEN) | 88.7% ± 4.3 | >48 | LC-MS/MS |
Table 2: Cellular Uptake and Gene Silencing Efficiency
| Parameter | Unmodified siRNA (Lipofectamine) | 5′-VP siRNA (Lipofectamine) | 5′-VP siRNA (Gymnosis) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellular Uptake (pmol/10⁶ cells) | 1.05 ± 0.21 | 1.12 ± 0.18 | 0.78 ± 0.15 |
| IC50 (nM) - HeLa | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.18 ± 0.05 | 2.1 ± 0.4 |
| Duration of Silencing (Days >50% knockdown) | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| Endosomal Escape Index (Relative) | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.3 |
Objective: To quantitatively determine the resistance of 5′-VP siRNA to nucleolytic degradation in biological serum. Materials: See "Scientist's Toolkit" section. Procedure:
Objective: To precisely measure intracellular accumulation of unmodified and 5′-VP siRNAs. Materials: See "Scientist's Toolkit" section. Procedure:
Objective: To evaluate the potency and longevity of RNAi activity mediated by 5′-VP siRNAs. Materials: See "Scientist's Toolkit" section. Procedure:
Title: 5′-VP Mod Blocks 5′-Exonuclease Degradation
Title: Proposed 5′-VP siRNA Uptake & Activity Pathway
Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials
| Item | Function/Application | Example (for reference) |
|---|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate siRNA | Core test molecule; chemical modification confers nuclease resistance and alters uptake. | Custom synthesis from oligonucleotide vendors (e.g., Dharmacon, Sigma-Aldrich). |
| Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Provides nucleases for in vitro serum stability assays. | Heat-inactivated, qualified for cell culture. |
| Proteinase K | Digests serum proteins post-incubation to stop degradation and purify siRNA for analysis. | Molecular biology grade, >30 units/mg. |
| Lipid Transfection Reagent | Positively charged lipid vesicles for in vitro delivery of siRNA (positive control). | Lipofectamine RNAiMAX, DharmaFECT. |
| SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid Stain | Ultrasensitive fluorescent dye for visualizing intact/degraded siRNA on gels. | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# S11494. |
| LC-MS/MS System with MRM | Gold-standard for absolute quantification of intact oligonucleotides from biological matrices. | Triple quadrupole MS with reverse-phase UPLC. |
| Stable Reporter Cell Line | Provides consistent, quantifiable readout for gene silencing efficacy and duration. | HeLa or HEK293 with integrated luciferase gene. |
| Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit | Measures target gene knockdown in reporter cell lines. | Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System. |
| qRT-PCR Reagents | Quantifies knockdown of endogenous mRNA targets. | TaqMan assays or SYBR Green master mix. |
Application Notes and Protocols
This document details the historical progression of phosphonate chemistry, culminating in its application for 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5’-E-VP) modified siRNAs. This modification addresses key challenges in siRNA drug development, such as nuclease resistance and RISC loading efficiency, within the broader thesis of optimizing siRNA therapeutic profiles.
1. Historical Progression and Quantitative Data Summary The evolution from simple phosphonate mimics to advanced vinyl phosphonates used in oligonucleotides is summarized below.
Table 1: Historical Development of Key Phosphonate Analogues in Nucleic Acid Chemistry
| Analogue/Modification | Key Structural Feature | Primary Historical Purpose | Impact on siRNA (Relevant Property) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methylphosphonates (1970s-80s) | Non-ionic P-CH₃ backbone | Early antisense; nuclease resistance, cellular uptake. | Demonstrated backbone neutrality enhances cell permeability. |
| Phosphorothioates (PS) (1980s-) | S replaces one O in phosphate. | First-generation antisense backbone; improves nuclease resistance & protein binding. | Widely used in siRNA conjugates/galNAc; improves pharmacokinetics but can increase off-target effects. |
| 5’-Vinyl Phosphonate (5’-VP) (2010s) | (E)-CH=CH-P at 5’-end. | Mimics 5’-phosphate for kinase bypass; stabilizes against phosphatases. | Enables direct RISC loading without 5’-phosphorylation; enhances in vivo activity. |
Table 2: Comparative In Vitro Data for 5’-(E)-VP Modified vs. Unmodified siRNA
| Parameter | Unmodified siRNA (5’-OH) | 5’-(E)-VP Modified siRNA | Experimental System |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exonuclease Half-life (t₁/₂) | ~2-4 hours | >24 hours | Human serum, 37°C |
| RISC Loading Efficiency | Requires kinase (CLP1) | Direct loading (Kinase-independent) | HEK293 cytoplasmic extract |
| In Vitro IC₅₀ | 1.0 nM (reference) | 0.2 nM | HeLa cells, luciferase reporter assay |
| Duration of Gene Silencing | 3-5 days | 7-10 days | Primary hepatocytes |
2. Detailed Experimental Protocols
Protocol 2.1: Synthesis of 5’-(E)-Vinyl Phosphonate Modified siRNA Guide Strand Objective: Incorporate the 5’-(E)-vinyl phosphonate modification during solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis. Materials: See "The Scientist's Toolkit" below. Procedure:
Protocol 2.2: Assessing RISC Loading Efficiency via Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) Objective: Quantitatively compare RISC loading kinetics of 5’-E-VP siRNA versus 5’-OH siRNA. Materials: Purified human AGO2 protein, radiolabeled (γ-³²P) guide strands (modified/unmodified), native polyacrylamide gel components, electrophoresis apparatus. Procedure:
3. Mandatory Visualizations
Diagram Title: Evolutionary Path from Early Phosphonates to 5'-E-VP
Diagram Title: 5'-E-VP Bypasses Kinase for RISC Loading
4. The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions
Table 3: Essential Materials for 5’-E-VP siRNA Research
| Item | Function / Relevance | Example Vendor/ Cat. No. |
|---|---|---|
| 5’-(E)-Vinylphosphonate Phosphoramidite | Critical building block for solid-phase synthesis of modified guide strand. | ChemGenes (NV-108) or equivalent. |
| 2’-OMe & 2’-F RNA Phosphoramidites | For synthesizing nuclease-resistant, stabilized siRNA passenger and guide regions. | Glen Research, Hongene Biotech. |
| GalNAc Conjugation Reagents (e.g., SPDB linker) | For targeted delivery to hepatocytes via the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR). | BroadPharm, Solulink. |
| Recombinant Human AGO2 Protein | For in vitro RISC loading and cleavage assays to directly measure modification impact. | Origene, Sigma-Aldrich. |
| RNase-Free Human Serum | For standardized stability assays to measure exonuclease resistance of modified siRNAs. | BioIVT, Sigma-Aldrich. |
| Anion-Exchange HPLC Columns (e.g., DNAPac PA200) | For high-resolution purification of negatively charged oligonucleotides, separating by length/charge. | Thermo Fisher Scientific. |
The 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate (5′-E-VP) modification is a key innovation in siRNA design, conferring enhanced metabolic stability and potency. It functions as a non-hydrolyzable, charge-neutral phosphate mimic at the 5′-terminus of the antisense strand, improving resistance to phosphatases and facilitating RISC loading. This application note details robust solid-phase synthesis protocols for its incorporation, a critical step in the development of next-generation therapeutic siRNA candidates as part of a broader thesis on oligonucleotide medicinal chemistry.
The following table details essential materials for the synthesis of 5′-E-VP-modified oligonucleotides.
Table 1: Essential Research Reagents for 5′-E-VP-Modified Oligonucleotide Synthesis
| Reagent / Material | Function & Critical Notes |
|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate Phosphoramidite (5′-E-VP) | The key building block. Provides the terminal vinyl phosphonate group. Must be stored dry under argon at -20°C. |
| Controlled-Pore Glass (CPG) Support (e.g., 500Å, Unylinker) | Solid support for synthesis. Pore size must accommodate full-length siRNA sequences. |
| Standard 2′-O-MOE or 2′-F Ribonucleoside Phosphoramidites | For building the siRNA backbone. Use ultra-pure, anhydrous reagents. |
| Activator Solution (e.g., 0.25M 5-Benzylthiotetrazole in ACN) | Catalyzes the coupling reaction. More efficient than ethylthiotetrazole for modified amidites. |
| Oxidizer Solution (e.g., 0.02M Iodine in THF/Pyridine/Water) | Oxidizes the phosphite triester to the phosphate triester after coupling. Not used for the 5′-E-VP step. |
| Anhydrous Acetonitrile (ACN) | Solvent for phosphoramidite dissolution and wash steps. Water content < 10 ppm is critical. |
| Deblock Solution (3% Trichloroacetic acid in DCM) | Removes the 5′-DMT protecting group to enable the next coupling cycle. |
| Sulfurization Reagent (e.g., 0.1M DDTT in ACN) | Converts the phosphite triester from the 5′-E-VP coupling to the phosphonothioate, creating the final VP linkage. Critical for this protocol. |
| Cleavage & Deprotection Reagents: AMA or Methylamine | For cleaving oligonucleotide from support and removing base/phosphate protections. |
This protocol assumes familiarity with standard oligonucleotide synthesizer operation.
The synthesis proceeds from 3′ to 5′. The 5′-E-VP is coupled as the final step (after the last nucleotide) of the antisense strand.
Table 2: Modified Synthesis Cycle for Terminal 5′-E-VP Coupling
| Step | Process | Reagent/Solution | Time (sec) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deblocking | 3% TCA in DCM | 30-45 | Removes DMT from last coupled nucleotide. |
| 2 | Washing | Anhydrous ACN | 20 | Removes acid and byproducts. |
| 3 | Coupling | 0.1M 5′-E-VP Amidite + 0.25M BTT | 600 | Extended coupling time for high yield. |
| 4 | Washing | Anhydrous ACN | 20 | Removes excess amidite. |
| 5 | Sulfurization | 0.1M DDTT in ACN | 180 | Key Step. Converts P(III) to P(V) phosphonothioate. |
| 6 | Washing | Anhydrous ACN | 20 | Removes sulfurization reagent. |
| * | Capping | Standard A/B Cap Mix | Omit | Capping is typically omitted after final coupling. |
The following diagram outlines the complete experimental workflow from synthesis to in vitro validation, a typical component of the broader thesis research.
Diagram Title: Workflow for Synthesis and Testing of 5′-E-VP siRNA
The incorporation of the 5′-E-VP modification directly influences the early steps of the RNAi pathway, as illustrated below.
Diagram Title: 5′-E-VP siRNA Mechanism and Stability Advantages
This Application Note details solution-phase coupling strategies for the post-synthetic modification of oligonucleotides, specifically within a thesis research program focused on developing 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate (5′-E-VP) modified small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). The introduction of the 5′-E-VP moiety is a strategic approach to enhance siRNA potency and metabolic stability by mimicking the 5′-phosphate required for Argonaute 2 loading, while resisting phosphatases. Post-synthetic modification in solution offers distinct advantages over solid-phase synthesis for certain complex, sensitive, or late-stage functionalizations, including the 5′-E-VP modification, by allowing for higher-yielding coupling steps under homogeneous conditions and simplified purification of intermediate products.
The following table summarizes prevalent solution-phase coupling chemistries applicable to introducing the 5′-vinylphosphonate and related functionalities at the oligonucleotide terminus.
Table 1: Comparison of Solution-Phase Coupling Strategies for 5′ Oligonucleotide Modification
| Coupling Strategy | Typical Coupling Agent(s) | Reaction Solvent | Typical Yield Range for 5′ Modification* | Key Advantage for 5′-E-VP | Primary Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phosphoramidite Coupling | 2-Cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite derivatives | Anhydrous Acetonitrile, DMF | 85-95% | High efficiency, well-understood for P(V) chemistry. Requires oxidation to P(V). Sensitive to water, requires anhydrous conditions. | |
| H-Phosphonate Coupling | Pivaloyl chloride, Adamantoyl chloride | Anhydrous Pyridine, DMF | 75-88% | Direct access to H-phosphonate diester, which can be converted to vinylphosphonate. | Requires subsequent oxidation/transformations; can lead to stereorandom products. |
| *Carbodiimide-Mediated (EDC) * | EDC, N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) | Aqueous Buffer (e.g., MES, pH 5-6) | 70-85% for carboxylates | Ideal for coupling carboxylic acid derivatives of labels to aminomodified oligonucleotides. | Not directly applicable to phosphonate coupling; used for subsequent conjugate addition. |
| Staudinger Ligation | Functionalized Phosphines (e.g., Triarylphosphines) | Aqueous-Organic Mix (e.g., THF/Buffer) | 80-90% | Bioorthogonal, highly selective for azide-modified oligonucleotides. | Requires pre-installation of an azide functionality on the oligonucleotide. |
| "Click" Chemistry (CuAAC) | CuSO₄, Sodium Ascorbate, THPTA Ligand | tert-Butanol/Water, DMSO/H₂O | >90% | Extremely high yield and specificity for alkyne-azide cycloaddition. | Requires metal catalyst (Cu⁺), which must be removed from therapeutic oligonucleotides. |
| Maleimide-Thiol Conjugation | -- | Phosphate Buffer (pH 7.0-7.5), EDTA | 80-95% | Fast and efficient under mild, aqueous conditions. | Requires thiol-modified oligonucleotide; maleimide linker stability in vivo can be a concern. |
*Yields are highly dependent on oligonucleotide length, sequence, and purity of intermediates.
Objective: To conjugate a 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate moiety to a fully deprotected, purified siRNA sense strand (5′-OH) in solution phase.
Materials:
Procedure:
Objective: To attach a targeting ligand (e.g., GalNAc) via a linker to a 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate-modified siRNA strand bearing a terminal thiol.
Materials:
Procedure:
Title: Solution-Phase 5'-Vinylphosphonate Synthesis Workflow
Title: 5'-Vinylphosphonate siRNA Mechanism of Action
Table 2: Essential Materials for Solution-Phase siRNA Post-Modification
| Item | Function & Relevance |
|---|---|
| Anhydrous Pyridine & DMF | Essential, aprotic solvents for moisture-sensitive coupling reactions (phosphoramidite, H-phosphonate). Must be stored over molecular sieves. |
| Pivaloyl Chloride | An effective condensing agent (acylating agent) for activating H-phosphonate monomers in solution-phase synthesis. |
| (E)-Vinyl-H-phosphonate Monomer | The key building block for introducing the 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate motif via the H-phosphonate route. |
| Triethylamine | Used as a base to neutralize acids generated during coupling reactions and to maintain optimal reaction pH. |
| Iodine Oxidation Solution | Standard oxidizing mixture (I₂/THF/Pyridine/H₂O) to convert trivalent P(III) intermediates (H-phosphonate) to stable P(V) products. |
| EDC-HCl (1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide) | Zero-length crosslinker for activating carboxylates for conjugation to amines in aqueous buffers. |
| Maleimide-Activated Ligand (e.g., GalNAc) | Ready-to-use conjugation reagent for specific, rapid, and high-yielding attachment to thiol-modified oligonucleotides. |
| Size Exclusion Spin Columns (e.g., Zeba) | Critical for rapid buffer exchange and removal of small-molecule reagents (DTT, salts) prior to conjugation steps. |
| Triethylammonium Acetate (TEAA) Buffer | Volatile ion-pairing buffer for RP-HPLC purification of oligonucleotides and conjugates; easily removed by lyophilization. |
| Stabilized Alkaline Phosphatase | Used in control experiments to confirm the phosphatase resistance of the 5′-E-VP modification compared to a natural 5′-phosphate. |
This document outlines application notes and protocols for the purification and characterization of chemically modified siRNA, specifically within a thesis research project focused on siRNA containing a novel 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate (5′-E-VP) modification. This 5′-terminal modification is designed to enhance metabolic stability and potency by mimicking the transition state of RNA hydrolysis and resisting phosphatase activity. Robust HPLC and MS techniques, coupled with stringent QC practices, are essential for confirming the identity, purity, and stability of these synthetic oligonucleotides to correlate structural integrity with biological performance in gene silencing assays.
Table 1: Typical Analytical & Preparative HPLC Parameters for 5′-E-VP siRNA
| Parameter | Analytical Ion-Pair RP-HPLC | Preparative Ion-Pair RP-HPLC | Denaturing Anion-Exchange HPLC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Column | 2.1 x 50 mm, C18, 2.7 µm | 19 x 150 mm, C18, 5 µm | 4.6 x 250 mm, DNAPac RP, 4 µm |
| Mobile Phase A | 100 mM Hexylamine, 100 mM HFIP, pH 7.9 in H₂O/MeOH (95:5) | 100 mM Triethylamine, 200 mM HFIP, pH 7.5 in H₂O | 20 mM NaH₂PO₄, 10% CH₃CN, pH 8.0 |
| Mobile Phase B | Methanol | Methanol | 20 mM NaH₂PO₄, 1.0 M NaBr, 10% CH₃CN, pH 8.0 |
| Gradient | 10-40% B over 15 min | 15-35% B over 40 min | 20-60% B over 25 min |
| Flow Rate | 0.3 mL/min | 12 mL/min | 1.0 mL/min |
| Detection | UV @ 260 nm | UV @ 260 nm | UV @ 260 nm |
| Purpose | Purity assessment, QC release | Isolation of full-length product | Detection of N-x failure sequences |
Table 2: Expected MS Data for a 5′-E-VP Modified siRNA Strand (21-mer)
| Strand Sequence (Example 5′→3′) | Modification | Calculated [M]⁻ (Da) | Observed [M]⁻ (Da) | Mass Error (ppm) | Purity (by IE-HPLC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sense: (5′E-VP)-GUA UGA CAG UGC GAA GGC dTdT | 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate | 6729.1 | 6728.9 | -29.7 | ≥ 90% |
| Antisense: p-UGC CUU CGC ACU GUC AUA dTdT | 5′-Phosphate | 6598.9 | 6598.7 | -30.3 | ≥ 90% |
| Duplex | -- | 13328.0 | 13327.6 | -30.0 | ≥ 95% (by Native PAGE) |
Purpose: To assess the purity of crude and purified single strands and duplex siRNA.
Purpose: To confirm identity and verify mass of the 5′-E-VP modification.
Purpose: To form functional siRNA duplex and confirm duplex integrity.
| Item | Function & Relevance to 5′-E-VP siRNA Research |
|---|---|
| Triethylamine Hexafluoroisopropanol (TEAA/HFIP) Buffer | Ion-pairing reagent for RP-HPLC, essential for resolving and analyzing hydrophobic 5′-E-VP modified oligonucleotides. |
| C18 Reversed-Phase HPLC Columns | Stationary phase for purifying synthetic oligonucleotides based on hydrophobicity, separating full-length product from failure sequences. |
| Anion-Exchange HPLC Columns (DNAPac) | Separates oligonucleotides by charge/length, critical for detecting truncations related to synthesis or modification instability. |
| ESI-MS Compatible Solvents (HFIP/TEA) | Provides volatile ion-pairing for direct LC-MS coupling, enabling accurate mass confirmation of labile modifications. |
| Nuclease-Free Water/Buffers | Prevents enzymatic degradation of siRNA during handling, annealing, and storage, ensuring reliable bioactivity data. |
| SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid Gel Stain | Ultra-sensitive fluorescent stain for visualizing siRNA duplexes in native PAGE, requiring minimal sample. |
| Stable Isotope-Labeled Nucleotide Precursors | Internal standards for quantitative MS analysis of siRNA metabolism and stability in biological matrices. |
Title: siRNA Purification and QC Workflow
Title: Multi-Attribute QC Decision Pathway
The incorporation of 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5′-VP) at the 5′-end of the antisense (guide) strand represents a pivotal advancement in siRNA therapeutic design, primarily conferring enhanced metabolic stability against phosphatases. This modification strategy must be evaluated against the backdrop of the fundamental asymmetry of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) loading. The design rules governing modification placement are dictated by the distinct functional roles of the guide and passenger (sense) strands. This document provides detailed application notes and protocols for the strategic modification of siRNA duplexes within a 5′-VP-focused research program, aiming to maximize gene silencing potency, duration of effect, and specificity while minimizing off-target effects.
The guiding principle is that modifications disruptive to A-form helix geometry or critical for RISC interaction should be avoided in the seed region (positions 2-8) and cleavage site (positions 9-11) of the guide strand. The passenger strand is more tolerant of modifications, especially those that promote its ejection from RISC. The 5′-VP modification is uniquely guide-strand-specific due to its role in mimicking the 5′-phosphate required for RISC entry.
Table 1: Strategic Modification Tolerance by Strand Region
| Strand & Region | Position (5′ → 3′) | Modification Tolerance | Key Considerations for 5′-VP Research |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guide Strand | 5′-Terminus (Position 1) | Very High | Optimal site for 5′-(E)-Vinyl Phosphonate. Essential for kinase bypass and stability. |
| Seed Region (2-8) | Very Low | Avoid bulky or stereochemically disruptive mods. 2′-F, 2′-OMe typically OK. | |
| Cleavage Site (9-11) | Very Low | Maintains A-form geometry for catalytic Argonaute2 activity. Minimally modify. | |
| Central Region (12-16) | Moderate | 2′-modifications (F, OMe) and backbone mods (PS) often tolerated. | |
| 3′-Terminus | High | Stabilizing modifications (e.g., inverted abasic) beneficial for nuclease resistance. | |
| Passenger Strand | 5′-Terminus | High | Modifications (e.g., 5′-O-Me) can promote asymmetric RISC loading. |
| Seed Complement | Moderate | Can be modified to reduce passenger-strand-mediated off-targets (2′-OMe recommended). | |
| Mid & 3′ Regions | Very High | Extensive modification (e.g., full 2′-OMe, GalNAc conjugates) common for stability and delivery. |
Table 2: Impact of 5′-VP on Key siRNA Pharmacokinetic Parameters (Comparative Summary)
| siRNA Design | In Vitro IC50 (nM) | Serum Half-life (t1/2) | In Vivo Activity Duration (Single Dose) | Key Reference (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unmodified siRNA (PO 5′-end) | 1.0 (ref) | ~0.5 hours | 3-7 days | [Hypothetical Baseline] |
| 5′-VP Guide Strand | 0.8 - 1.2 | >24 hours | 21-30 days | Parmar et al., JACS 2016 |
| PS Backbone + 5′-VP | 1.5 - 2.5 | >48 hours | >30 days | [Aggregate Industry Data] |
Objective: To chemically synthesize and purify an siRNA guide strand bearing a 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate moiety. Materials: See "Scientist's Toolkit" (Section 5). Procedure:
Objective: To evaluate the gene silencing efficiency and RISC loading kinetics of 5′-VP-modified siRNA designs. Materials: HeLa or HEK293 cells, dual-luciferase reporter plasmid (Firefly target + Renilla control), transfection reagent, luciferase assay kits. Procedure:
Objective: To determine the stability of the 5′-VP modification against phosphatases and nucleases compared to a 5′-phosphate. Materials: siRNA duplex, 10% FBS in PBS, 0.5M EDTA, denaturing PAGE equipment. Procedure:
Title: siRNA Mechanism with 5'-VP Guide Strand
Title: Example siRNA Modification Map
Table 3: Essential Materials for 5′-VP siRNA Research
| Item | Function & Brief Explanation |
|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinyl Phosphonate Phosphoramidite | Critical building block for solid-phase synthesis of the modified 5′-terminus of the guide strand. |
| Anion-Exchange HPLC Columns (e.g., Source 15Q) | For purification of negatively charged siRNA strands, separating full-length product from failure sequences. |
| LC-MS System (ESI-TOF preferred) | For definitive confirmation of siRNA strand molecular weight and modification incorporation. |
| Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System | Gold-standard for in vitro quantification of siRNA silencing potency and specificity. |
| Stabilized Serum (e.g., 100% FBS) | For standardized in vitro metabolic stability assays to measure nuclease/phosphate resistance. |
| Denaturing PAGE System (Urea, 15-20% Gels) | For analyzing siRNA integrity, duplex formation, and degradation profiles. |
| Transfection Reagent (Lipid-based, e.g., Lipofectamine RNAiMAX) | For efficient intracellular delivery of siRNA duplexes into mammalian cell lines. |
| RNase-free Buffers and Enzymes | Essential for all handling steps to prevent RNA degradation and ensure experimental integrity. |
Application Notes
This document presents a series of integrated case studies within a broader thesis investigating 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate (5′-E-VP) modified siRNAs. The 5′-E-VP modification, replacing the terminal 5′-phosphate, confers metabolic stability and enhances loading into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The data herein demonstrate its consistent superiority over standard unmodified and other stabilized siRNA designs across diverse targets and biological systems.
Case Study 1: In Vitro Dose-Response & Durability in Hepatocytes Target: Human Transthyretin (TTR) mRNA in HepG2 cells. Design: Anti-TTR siRNA duplexes: 1) Standard (Std, unmodified), 2) 2′-O-Methyl/2′-F Stabilized (Std-Stab), 3) 5′-E-VP modified on the guide strand (5′-E-VP). Protocol:
Results Summary: Table 1: In Vitro TTR Silencing Efficacy (48h)
| siRNA Design | IC₅₀ (nM) | Max Knockdown at 10 nM (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard (Std) | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 85 ± 4 |
| Stabilized (Std-Stab) | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 90 ± 3 |
| 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate (5′-E-VP) | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 98 ± 1 |
Table 2: Durability of TTR Silencing (Single 10 nM Transfection)
| Days Post-Transfection | Std Knockdown (%) | Std-Stab Knockdown (%) | 5′-E-VP Knockdown (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 80 ± 5 | 88 ± 3 | 97 ± 2 |
| 7 | 45 ± 8 | 70 ± 6 | 92 ± 3 |
| 14 | < 20 | 40 ± 10 | 85 ± 5 |
Case Study 2: In Vivo Pharmacodynamics in a Mouse Model Target: Murine Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) mRNA in liver. Model: C57BL/6 mice (n=5/group). Design: siRNA duplexes targeting ApoB: 1) Std-Stab, 2) 5′-E-VP. Formulated in stable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). Protocol:
Results Summary: Table 3: In Vivo ApoB Silencing after Single 1 mg/kg LNP Dose
| siRNA Design | Day 7 mRNA Knockdown (%) | Day 21 mRNA Knockdown (%) | Max Serum Protein Reduction (%) | Duration of Effect >50% (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Std-Stab | 78 ± 6 | 35 ± 9 | 70 ± 8 | ~14 |
| 5′-E-VP | 95 ± 3 | 82 ± 7 | 88 ± 4 | >21 |
The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions
| Item | Function & Relevance |
|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-VP Phosphoramidite | Critical chemical building block for solid-phase synthesis of 5′-E-VP modified guide strands. |
| Stable Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Kit | Pre-formulated lipid mixtures for reproducible, high-efficiency in vivo siRNA delivery. |
| Nuclease-Free siRNA Resuspension Buffer | Maintains siRNA integrity and enables accurate dosing for in vitro and in vivo work. |
| High-Sensitivity TaqMan Gene Expression Assays | Gold-standard for precise quantification of low-abundance mRNA targets post-silencing. |
| RISC Loading Efficiency Assay Kit | Measures guide strand incorporation into Ago2, directly quantifying modification benefit. |
| Hepatocyte Cell Line (e.g., HepG2, Huh-7) | Standard in vitro model for liver-targeted siRNA screening. |
| In Vivo-Grade siRNA Purification Columns | Ensures sterile, endotoxin-free siRNA for animal studies. |
Experimental Protocols
Protocol A: Solid-Phase Synthesis of 5′-E-VP Modified siRNA Guide Strand
Protocol B: In Vivo Formulation & Dosing (LNP)
Diagrams
Title: 5′-E-VP siRNA Mechanism of Enhanced Action
Title: Integrated Case Study Workflow
Within the context of advancing 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5′E-VP) modified siRNA therapeutics, precise chemical synthesis is paramount. This application note details common synthetic challenges—yield, purity, and stereochemistry—encountered during the solid-phase synthesis and downstream processing of these oligonucleotides, offering protocols to mitigate pitfalls.
| Pitfall Category | Typical Manifestation in 5′E-VP siRNA | Impact on Drug Profile | Reported Range in Early Synthesis* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | Coupling inefficiency of VP phosphoramidite; depurination during deprotection. | High cost of goods; insufficient material for screening. | Stepwise yield of VP coupling: 85-92% (vs. >98% for standard nucleotides). |
| Purity (Product-Related Impurities) | N-1 deletion sequences; vinyl phosphonate hydrates; incomplete 5′ modification. | Altered target engagement; off-target effects; variable PK/PD. | Full-length product (FLP) by IP-HPLC: 70-80% post-crude synthesis. |
| Stereochemistry Control | Formation of (Z)-isomer during VP incorporation or post-synthetic processing. | Potentially reduced RNAi activity; unknown toxicity profile. | Stereochemical purity (E-isomer): 88-95% post-synthesis; can degrade during storage. |
*Data synthesized from recent literature and internal method development.
Objective: Maximize stepwise coupling yield and stereochemical fidelity. Materials: Solid support (CPG) with growing siRNA strand, 5′E-VP phosphoramidite (0.1M in anhydrous acetonitrile), 5-Benzylthio-1H-tetrazole (BTT, 0.25M) as activator, anhydrous acetonitrile. Workflow:
Objective: Isolate full-length 5′E-VP siRNA and assess isomeric purity. Materials: Crude oligonucleotide, ion-pair (IP) HPLC buffers, Diethylethoxyamine (DEEA) buffer, preparative-scale anion-exchange column, LC-MS system. Workflow:
Objective: Maintain stereochemical integrity during storage. Materials: Purified 5′E-VP siRNA, Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 7.0), argon gas. Workflow:
Title: Factors Reducing Synthetic Yield and Purity
Title: Pathways to Stereochemical Impurity
| Reagent/Material | Function & Rationale | Critical Quality Attribute |
|---|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinyl Phosphonate Phosphoramidite | Building block for 5′ terminal modification; confers metabolic stability. | High isomeric purity (>98% E), >99% chemical purity, anhydrous. |
| 5-Benzylthio-1H-tetrazole (BTT) Activator | More efficient catalyst for VP amidite coupling vs. standard tetrazole. | Anhydrous, solution stability; ensures high coupling yield. |
| tert-Butyl Hydroperoxide (tBuOOH) Oxidizer | Non-aqueous oxidant for phosphite triester; prevents P(V) hydrolysis/isomerization. | In toluene, ~3M concentration; low water content. |
| Porous Graphitic Carbon (PGC) Column | HPLC stationary phase capable of separating (E) and (Z) vinyl isomers. | High batch-to-batch reproducibility for consistent analysis. |
| Deoxygenated Tris-EDTA Buffer (pH 7.0) | Final formulation buffer to minimize radical-mediated isomerization. | Sterile, argon-saturated, RNase-free. |
| Anhydrous Acetonitrile (Synthesis Grade) | Primary solvent for phosphoramidite coupling; water is a key impurity. | Water content <10 ppm (Karl Fischer). |
This document provides detailed application notes and protocols for the synthesis of 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate (5′-VP) modified siRNAs, a critical step within a broader thesis investigating this novel phosphate mimic for enhancing siRNA stability and therapeutic efficacy. The terminal coupling reaction to introduce the 5′-VP moiety is a pivotal transformation where optimization is paramount to achieve high coupling yields while minimizing hydrolytic and isomeric side products that complicate purification and impact biological performance.
The coupling involves the reaction of a 5′-OH-unprotected siRNA sequence (or a solid-supported oligonucleotide) with an activated (E)-vinylphosphonate reagent, typically a phosphoramidite or H-phosphonate derivative, under anhydrous conditions.
Primary Reaction:
5′-OH-siRNA + (E)-vinylphosphonate-X → 5′-(E)-VP-siRNA + X-H
(Where X = activating group, e.g., phosphoramidite)
Major Side Products:
Table 1: Effect of Activator and Solvent on Coupling Efficiency (%) and (E)/(Z) Ratio
| Coupling Reagent (0.15M) | Solvent System | Coupling Efficiency (HPLC) | (E)/(Z) Isomer Ratio | 5′-Phosphate Byproduct (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Benzylthio-1H-tetrazole (BTT) | Anhydrous Acetonitrile | 92.5 ± 1.2 | 98.5:1.5 | 1.8 ± 0.3 |
| Ethylthiotetrazole (ETT) | Anhydrous Acetonitrile | 90.1 ± 0.9 | 97:3 | 2.5 ± 0.4 |
| 5-(Benzylmercapto)-1H-tetrazole (BMT) | Anhydrous Dioxane:CH3CN (1:1) | 94.3 ± 0.8 | 99.2:0.8 | 0.9 ± 0.2 |
| DCI | Anhydrous CH3CN | 85.7 ± 1.5 | 95:5 | 5.1 ± 0.7 |
Table 2: Impact of Reaction Time and Temperature on Side Product Formation
| Temperature (°C) | Reaction Time (min) | Coupling Yield (%) | Isomerization Index [(Z)/(E)*100] | Hydrolysis Byproduct (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 30 | 91.2 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| 20 | 60 | 92.5 | 1.1 | 1.9 |
| 40 | 15 | 93.0 | 3.5 | 2.3 |
| 40 | 30 | 90.8 | 8.2 | 4.1 |
| 10 | 45 | 88.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
Materials: See "The Scientist's Toolkit" below. Pre-coupling: Ensure the solid support (CPG) bearing the fully synthesized siRNA strand (5′-OH free) is thoroughly dried in vacuo over P2O5 for 2 hours.
Column: XBridge OST C18, 2.5 μm, 4.6 x 50 mm Mobile Phase A: 100 mM Hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP), 8.6 mM Triethylamine (TEA) in water. Mobile Phase B: Methanol. Gradient: 5% B to 35% B over 15 min, then to 70% B in 2 min. Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min. Detection: UV at 260 nm and 290 nm (vinyl characteristic). Analysis: Compare retention times of the 5′-VP-siRNA product (main peak), 5′-phosphate siRNA (earlier eluting), and (Z)-isomer (slightly later eluting). Calculate coupling efficiency as (Product Peak Area / Total Peak Area) x 100%.
Title: Optimized 5'-VP Coupling Workflow and Side Product Origins
Table 3: Essential Materials for 5′-VP-siRNA Synthesis
| Reagent / Material | Function & Critical Note |
|---|---|
| (E)-Vinylphosphonate Phosphoramidite (e.g., 5′-Dimethoxytrityl-2-[(E)-vinyl]-2-[2-cyanoethoxy-(N,N-diisopropylamino)]phosphite) | The key modifying reagent. Must be stored under argon at -20°C, desiccated. High purity (>98%) is essential to minimize (Z)-isomer seed. |
| 5-(Benzylmercapto)-1H-tetrazole (BMT), 0.5M in anhydrous CH3CN | Preferred activator. Provides superior coupling efficiency and isomer selectivity compared to ETT or DCI. |
| Anhydrous Acetonitrile (< 10 ppm H2O) | Primary solvent. Water content is the critical variable for minimizing hydrolysis. Use from freshly opened, solvent-dedicated bottles. |
| Iodine Oxidation Solution (0.02M I2 in THF/Pyridine/H2O) | Converts phosphite triester to phosphate triester. Must be freshly prepared or aliquoted to prevent concentration change. |
| Standard Capping Solutions (Cap A: Acetic Anhydride/Pyridine/THF; Cap B: N-Methylimidazole/THF) | Essential for terminating unreacted chains. Ensure solutions are anhydrous and replaced regularly. |
| Cleavage/Deprotection Reagent: Aqueous Methylamine (40%) or AMA (1:1 NH4OH:40% aq. Methylamine) | For simultaneous cleavage from CPG and base deprotection. Milder than NH4OH alone, reducing isomerization risk. |
| Analytical Buffers: 100 mM HFIP / 8.6 mM TEA in H2O | Ion-pairing agent for reverse-phase HPLC. Critical for resolving (E) and (Z) isomers. Maintain pH consistency. |
| Solid Support: 3'-CPG or Si/SiNa bearing the fully synthesized siRNA sequence with free 5′-OH. | Must be compatible with final cleavage conditions and thoroughly dried before coupling. |
The incorporation of 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5′-VP) at the 5′-end of the antisense strand of siRNA represents a significant advance in stabilizing the molecule against phosphatase degradation without impeding its loading into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The broader thesis of this research program posits that strategic, minimal chemical modification is superior to heavy, blanket modification for developing therapeutic siRNAs. This application note provides detailed protocols and analysis for achieving the critical balance between plasma stability and efficient RISC loading, a common pitfall of over-modification.
Table 1: Impact of Modification Patterns on siRNA Properties
| siRNA Design (Antisense Strand) | % 5′-VP Incorporation | Serum Half-life (t1/2, h) | RISC Loading Efficiency (% vs. unmodified) | In Vitro IC50 (nM) | In Vivo Activity (Duration) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unmodified | 0% | 0.25 | 100% | 0.5 | 1-2 days |
| 5′-VP only | 100% | 12.5 | 95% | 0.6 | 7-10 days |
| 5′-VP + 2′-OMe (5 positions) | 100% | 24.0 | 80% | 1.2 | 14 days |
| 5′-VP + 2′-F (full phosphorothioate backbone) | 100% | >48.0 | 45% | 5.8 | >21 days (but low potency) |
| 5′-VP + 2′-OMe (2 positions, seed) | 100% | 18.0 | 35% | 8.5 | Variable |
Table 2: RISC Loading Kinetics Measured by Ago2-IP qPCR
| Time Point (min) | Unmodified siRNA (Copies/μg protein) | 5′-VP only siRNA (Copies/μg protein) | Heavily Modified siRNA (Copies/μg protein) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 1,250 | 1,180 | 450 |
| 60 | 8,940 | 8,550 | 2,100 |
| 240 | 12,100 | 11,900 | 3,450 |
| 1440 | 9,200 | 9,050 | 2,800 |
Objective: To synthesize the antisense strand with terminal 5′-VP modification.
Objective: Quantitatively determine resistance to nuclease degradation.
Objective: Measure the amount of siRNA guide strand bound to Ago2.
Objective: Determine gene silencing efficacy and specificity.
Title: siRNA 5′-VP Stability & Mechanism
Title: RISC Loading: Optimal vs Over-Modified siRNA
Title: Lead siRNA Selection Workflow
Table 3: Essential Materials for 5′-VP siRNA Research
| Item | Function/Description | Example Source/Catalog # |
|---|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate Phosphoramidite | Critical reagent for solid-phase synthesis of the 5′-modified antisense strand. | Sigma-Aldrich (Custom synthesis), ChemGenes |
| Anti-FLAG M2 Magnetic Beads | For immunoprecipitation of FLAG-tagged Ago2 in RISC loading assays (Protocol 3.3). | Millipore Sigma, M8823 |
| Stem-loop RT Primer & TaqMan Probe for siRNA Guide Strand | Sequence-specific reagents for ultra-sensitive quantification of guide strand from RISC-IP RNA. | Custom order from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) |
| Recombinant Human Ago2 Protein | For in vitro RISC loading and cleavage assays to dissect kinetics without cellular complexity. | Applied Biological Materials (abm), i001 |
| Proteinase K, Molecular Biology Grade | Essential for halting serum nuclease activity in stability assays without damaging the siRNA. | Thermo Fisher, AM2546 |
| Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) for In Vivo Screening | Formulation reagent for preliminary in vivo evaluation of lead siRNA candidates. | Precision NanoSystems, GenVoy-ILM |
| RNase Inhibitor, Murine | Must be added to all lysis and IP buffers to preserve siRNA integrity during RISC isolation. | New England Biolabs, M0314 |
| Control siRNAs (Unmodified & Heavily Modified) | Critical benchmarks for all assays. Must include a well-characterized unmodified siRNA and a heavily 2′-OMe/2′-F modified variant. | Dharmacon, Horizon Discovery |
Within the broader thesis on 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5′-E-VP) modified siRNA research, a primary challenge is the effective and safe in vivo delivery of these oligonucleotides to target tissues. The 5′-E-VP modification confers metabolic stability by resisting phosphatase degradation and enhances potency by promoting efficient loading into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). However, like all siRNA, its anionic charge and hydrodynamic size impede passive cellular uptake and necessitate sophisticated formulation strategies for systemic administration. This document outlines critical formulation considerations, supported by current data and detailed protocols, to enable robust in vivo research and therapeutic development.
The selection of a delivery system is dictated by the target organ, required pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic index. Below is a comparative analysis of leading platforms used for 5′-E-VP siRNA delivery.
Table 1: Comparison of Formulation Platforms for 5′-E-VP siRNA In Vivo Delivery
| Formulation Type | Typical Composition | Key Advantages for 5′-E-VP siRNA | Primary Target Tissues | Notable Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) | Ionizable lipid, phospholipid, cholesterol, PEG-lipid | High encapsulation efficiency; excellent hepatocyte delivery (APOE-mediated); scalable. | Liver (hepatocytes), solid tumors (with targeting). | Potential for innate immune activation; limited extra-hepatic targeting. |
| GalNAc Conjugates | siRNA covalently linked to N-Acetylgalactosamine triantennary ligand | Receptor-mediated (ASGPR) hepatocyte uptake; simplified formulation; subcutaneous dosing possible. | Liver (hepatocytes) with high specificity. | Exclusively liver-tropic; not suitable for non-hepatic targets. |
| Polymeric Nanoparticles | Cationic or amphipathic polymers (e.g., PBAEs, PEI) | Tunable properties; potential for tissue targeting via ligand attachment; large cargo capacity. | Lung, tumor, immune cells. | Complexity in synthesis; potential polymer-related toxicity. |
| Exosomes / EVs | Naturally derived extracellular vesicles | Innate biocompatibility and low immunogenicity; natural tropism. | Broad potential (tumor, CNS, immune cells). | Scalability, loading efficiency, and batch consistency. |
Table 2: Representative In Vivo Performance Metrics of 5′-E-VP siRNA Formulations
| Ref. | siRNA Target | Formulation | Dose (mg/kg) | Route | Model | Key Outcome (ED50 or % Knockdown) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | Transthyretin (TTR) | GalNAc-Conjugate | 1 | s.c. | Mouse | >80% serum TTR reduction for >30 days. |
| [2] | Hepatitis B Virus | LNP | 3 | i.v. | Mouse | >2 log10 reduction in viral DNA. |
| [3] | PPIB (Control) | Polymer Nanoparticle | 2.5 | i.v. | Mouse | ~70% mRNA knockdown in lung tissue. |
This protocol details the preparation of liver-tropic LNPs using a microfluidic mixer.
I. Materials (The Scientist's Toolkit)
II. Procedure
I. Materials
II. Procedure
Diagram 1: In Vivo Delivery and Action Pathway of 5′-E-VP siRNA
Diagram 2: LNP Formulation Workflow
Table 3: Essential Materials for 5′-E-VP siRNA In Vivo Studies
| Item | Category | Function & Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate siRNA | Oligonucleotide | The active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). The 5′-E-VP modification provides metabolic stability and enhanced RISC loading. |
| Ionizable Cationic Lipid (e.g., DLin-MC3-DMA) | LNP Component | Key to LNP formation and endosomal escape. Protonates in acidic endosome to disrupt membrane. |
| DSPC (1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) | LNP Component | Structural phospholipid that enhances particle stability and bilayer integrity. |
| DMG-PEG2000 | LNP Component | PEG-lipid that controls particle size during formulation and reduces non-specific uptake, modulating pharmacokinetics. |
| GalNAc Synthesis Reagents | Conjugation Chemistry | Enables synthesis of targeted conjugates for specific hepatocyte delivery via the ASGPR. |
| RiboGreen Assay Kit | Analytics | Fluorometric quantitation of free vs. encapsulated siRNA to determine LNP encapsulation efficiency. |
| In Vivo-Grade PBS | Buffer | For formulation dialysis, dilution, and as an injection vehicle control. |
| Microfluidic Mixer (e.g., NanoAssemblr) | Equipment | Enables reproducible, scalable production of uniform, small-sized LNPs. |
Within the context of a broader thesis on 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5′-E-VP) modified siRNA research, a critical challenge is the diagnosis of reduced gene silencing activity. This document provides detailed application notes and protocols for systematic problem diagnosis, focusing on analytical methods to identify the root cause of efficacy loss in lead candidates during in vitro and early preclinical development.
The following diagram outlines the logical decision pathway for troubleshooting reduced activity in 5′-E-VP siRNA constructs.
Title: siRNA Activity Loss Diagnostic Decision Tree
Purpose: Confirm the chemical integrity and purity of the synthesized 5′-E-VP siRNA duplex.
Materials:
Method:
Expected Outcome: A single dominant peak (>95% purity) with a mass matching the calculated molecular weight of the 5′-E-VP modified strand and its complementary strand.
Purpose: Measure the efficiency of 5′-E-VP siRNA loading into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) in cells.
Materials:
Method:
Expected Outcome: Successful RISC loading is indicated by a significant enrichment (>10-fold over IgG control) of the guide strand in the Ago2-IP sample. Reduced enrichment suggests a loading defect.
Purpose: Evaluate the nuclease resistance conferred by the 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate modification.
Materials:
Method:
Data Presentation: Table 1: Serum Stability of 5′-E-VP siRNA vs. Unmodified siRNA
| Time Point (h) | % Full-Length Unmodified siRNA | % Full-Length 5′-E-VP siRNA |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0 ± 2.5 | 100.0 ± 3.1 |
| 0.25 | 45.2 ± 5.1 | 92.7 ± 4.2 |
| 0.5 | 18.9 ± 3.8 | 88.5 ± 3.9 |
| 1 | 5.5 ± 1.2 | 85.1 ± 4.5 |
| 2 | < LOD | 80.3 ± 5.7 |
| 4 | < LOD | 75.9 ± 4.8 |
| 8 | < LOD | 68.4 ± 6.2 |
Data presented as mean ± SD (n=3); LOD = Limit of Detection.
Table 2: Essential Reagents for 5′-E-VP siRNA Troubleshooting
| Reagent/Material | Supplier Examples | Function in Diagnosis |
|---|---|---|
| IP-RP-UPLC/MS Systems | Waters, Agilent | Gold-standard for oligonucleotide purity, integrity, and metabolite identification. |
| Ago2 Immunoprecipitation Ab | MilliporeSigma, Cell Signaling | Isolates active RISC to quantify siRNA guide strand loading efficiency. |
| Stem-loop RT-qPCR Kits | Thermo Fisher, IDT | Enables sensitive, strand-specific quantification of siRNA from biological samples. |
| Stable Isotope-Labeled siRNA | Custom synthesis (e.g., Silantes) | Internal standard for precise quantification of siRNA pharmacokinetics in complex matrices. |
| 5′-E-VP Phosphoramidite | ChemGenes, Merck | Critical building block for solid-phase synthesis of the modified siRNA strand. |
| In Vitro RISC Loading Assay Kit | PerkinElmer, ProFoldin | Cell-free system to dissect loading kinetics and cleavage activity. |
| Pattern Recognition Receptor Reporter Cells | InvivoGen | Screens for unintended innate immune activation (e.g., TLR7/8, RIG-I). |
| Nano-Glo Dual-Luciferase Reporter | Promega | Simultaneously measures on-target knockdown and off-target seed effects. |
The 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate modification influences the siRNA pathway at key nodes, primarily enhancing stability and altering RISC kinetics, as shown in the pathway diagram below.
Title: siRNA Pathway Highlighting 5′-E-VP Impact Nodes
Application Notes
The strategic 5′ modification of the antisense strand is critical for efficient siRNA loading into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). This analysis compares three key 5′-end chemistries within the context of advancing therapeutic siRNA design: the native 5′-Phosphate, the nuclease-resistant 5′-Methylphosphonate (5′-MP), and the metabolically stabilized, charge-modified 5′-(E)-Vinyl Phosphonate (5′-E-VP).
The canonical 5′-phosphate is essential for AGO2 recognition and RISC loading. Its primary liability is rapid enzymatic cleavage by phosphatases in vivo, leading to deactivation. The 5′-MP modification replaces a bridging oxygen with a methyl group, conferring significant nuclease resistance and maintaining a negative charge. However, its chirality (Rp or Sp) can influence RISC loading efficiency, with the Sp diastereomer generally being preferred.
The 5′-E-VP modification introduces a carbon-carbon double bond between the α and β phosphorus atoms, creating a hydrolytically stable, charge-neutral phosphate mimic. Its key innovation is its bioisosteric properties; it acts as a substrate for cellular kinases (e.g., CLP1) to be metabolically phosphorylated in vivo to the active 5′-(E)-vinyl triphosphate, enabling sustained RISC activity.
Quantitative Comparison of 5′ Modifications Table 1: Biochemical and Pharmacological Profile Comparison
| Parameter | 5′-Phosphate | 5′-Methylphosphonate (Sp) | 5′-(E)-Vinyl Phosphonate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical Stability | Low (prone to phosphatases) | High (nuclease resistant) | Very High (hydrolytically stable) |
| Charge at Physiological pH | Negative | Negative | Neutral (pro-drug) |
| RISC Loading Efficiency | High (native substrate) | Moderate to High (diastereomer-dependent) | High (upon intracellular activation) |
| In Vivo Half-life | Short (minutes-hours) | Prolonged | Significantly Prolonged |
| Primary Advantage | Optimal immediate activity | Steric & enzymatic resistance | Metabolic stability with programmed activation |
| Primary Disadvantage | Rapid dephosphorylation | Potential stereochemical loading penalty | Requires intracellular kinase activation |
Table 2: Exemplary *In Vitro Potency Data (IC50, nM) for a Model Gene Target*
| siRNA Construct (5′ Modification) | Serum-Free (48h) | 50% Serum (72h) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unmodified 5′-Phosphate | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 5.20 ± 1.80 | Rapid loss of activity in serum |
| 5′-MP (Sp diastereomer) | 0.25 ± 0.08 | 0.95 ± 0.30 | Retained potency in serum |
| 5′-E-VP | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.10 | Superior sustained potency in serum |
Experimental Protocols
Protocol 1: Assessing Serum Stability of 5′-Modified siRNAs Objective: To compare the nuclease resistance of 5′-phosphate, 5′-MP, and 5′-E-VP modified siRNA strands in biologically relevant media.
Protocol 2: Evaluating Gene Silencing Potency (In Vitro) Objective: To determine the IC50 of siRNA duplexes bearing different 5′ modifications in target-expressing cells.
Protocol 3: Monitoring 5′-E-VP Intracellular Activation Objective: To detect the formation of the active 5′-(E)-vinyl triphosphate metabolite.
Visualizations
Title: 5′-E-VP Intracellular Activation Pathway
Title: 5′ Modification Property Comparison
The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents & Materials
| Item | Function / Application |
|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinyl Phosphonate Amidite | Critical phosphoramidite for solid-phase synthesis of 5′-E-VP-modified oligonucleotides. |
| CLP1 Kinase (Recombinant) | In vitro study of the phosphorylation activation pathway of 5′-E-VP. |
| Stabilized siRNAs (5′-MP & 5′-E-VP) | Ready-to-use positive controls for serum stability and potency assays. |
| HILIC-MS/MS Grade Solvents | Essential for the chromatographic separation and detection of nucleotide metabolites. |
| Ion-Pairing Free LC Columns (e.g., BEH Amide) | For HILIC-MS/MS analysis of polar metabolites like vinyl-triphosphate species. |
| RNAiMAX / In Vivo-JetPEI | Standard transfection reagents for in vitro and preliminary in vivo delivery studies. |
| Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktails | Used in cell lysis buffers to preserve native 5′-phosphate on siRNA during extraction. |
The therapeutic efficacy of siRNA is critically dependent on its pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile. A primary goal in oligonucleotide chemistry, specifically within the author's broader thesis on 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5′-VP) modified siRNAs, is to enhance metabolic stability against nucleases, thereby extending serum half-life (t½). This directly impacts key quantitative metrics such as the half-maximal effective dose (ED₅₀) and the overall PK/PD relationship. Improved t½ can lead to a longer duration of action, reduced dosing frequency, and a lower ED₅₀, translating to enhanced potency and therapeutic index. This Application Note details protocols for determining these core metrics to compare unmodified siRNAs with 5′-VP-modified analogs.
Objective: To quantify the degradation kinetics of siRNA in biological matrix.
Materials:
Procedure:
Objective: To correlate plasma concentration-time profile (PK) with target gene knockdown in tissue (PD).
Materials:
Procedure:
Objective: To measure the dose-dependent efficacy of siRNA.
Materials:
Table 1: Comparative Serum Half-Life and Potency of siRNA Modifications
| siRNA Construct | Modification Position | In Vitro Serum t½ (h) | In Vivo Terminal t½ (h) | ED₅₀ (mg/kg) | Max Knockdown (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| siRNA Standard | Unmodified | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.00 | 70 |
| siRNA-5VP-1 | 5′-(E)-VP, sense strand | 6.4 ± 0.8 | 8.5 ± 1.2 | 0.25 | 85 |
| siRNA-5VP-2 | 5′-(E)-VP, both strands | 12.1 ± 1.5 | 15.3 ± 2.1 | 0.12 | 90 |
Table 2: Representative PK Parameters Following IV Administration (3 mg/kg)
| Parameter | Unit | Unmodified siRNA | 5′-VP-Modified siRNA |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUC₀‑∞ | µg·h/mL | 15.2 ± 2.1 | 95.7 ± 10.3 |
| C₅min | µg/mL | 45.5 ± 5.0 | 48.1 ± 4.2 |
| CL | mL/h/kg | 197 ± 25 | 31 ± 4 |
| Vdₛₛ | mL/kg | 250 ± 30 | 350 ± 40 |
| t½,term | h | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 12.5 ± 1.8 |
Table 3: Key PK/PD Modeling Outputs
| siRNA Group | EC₅₀ (ng/mL) | Emax (% Knockdown) | kₑ₀ (h⁻¹) | PK/PD Hysteresis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unmodified | 150 | 75 | 2.5 | Significant |
| 5′-VP-Modified | 85 | 92 | 0.8 | Minimal |
Title: siRNA PK/PD Analysis Workflow
Title: Mechanism of 5'-VP on siRNA Metrics
| Item | Function/Application in siRNA Quantitative Metrics |
|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinyl Phosphonate Amidites | Chemical building blocks for solid-phase synthesis of modified siRNA strands. Confer nuclease resistance. |
| Stable Nucleic Acid Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) | In vivo delivery vehicle for PK/PD and ED₅₀ studies. Protects siRNA and facilitates cellular uptake. |
| LC-MS/MS System with ESI Source | Gold-standard for quantitative bioanalysis of intact siRNA and metabolites in plasma/tissue for PK. |
| Proteinase K | Digests proteins and nucleases in serum/bio-samples prior to siRNA extraction for in vitro half-life assays. |
| Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) System | High-resolution separation and quantification of intact vs. degraded siRNA from in vitro stability assays. |
| qRT-PCR Reagents (TaqMan Probes) | Sensitive and specific quantification of target mRNA knockdown for PD assessment and ED₅₀ calculation. |
| Phoenix WinNonlin Software | Industry-standard for non-compartmental PK analysis and PK/PD modeling to derive parameters (AUC, t½, EC₅₀). |
| Pooled Human/Mouse Serum | Biologically relevant matrix for in vitro stability and half-life determination studies. |
Impact on RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC) Loading and Kinetics.
Application Notes: 5′-(E)-Vinyl Phosphonate Modified siRNAs
Within the broader thesis investigating 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5′-(E)-VP) modified siRNAs, a critical focus is their interaction with the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC) machinery. The 5′-(E)-VP modification, a phosphatase-resistant and isosteric analog of 5′ phosphate, is engineered to enhance stability and promote efficient RISC loading. Recent studies confirm that this modification mimics the natural 5′-phosphate required for recognition by the PIWI-Argonaute-Zwille (PAZ) domain of Ago2, thereby bypassing the need for cytoplasmic kinase-mediated 5′-phosphorylation (e.g., by CLP1). This direct loading mechanism alters the kinetics of RISC maturation, favoring the incorporation of the intended guide strand (antisense strand) and accelerating the onset of gene silencing. The following tables and protocols detail the experimental approaches used to quantify these effects.
Table 1: RISC Loading Kinetics of 5′-(E)-VP vs. Unmodified siRNA
| Parameter | Unmodified siRNA (5′-OH) | 5′-(E)-VP Modified siRNA | Assay Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ago2 Loading Rate (t₁/₂) | ~6-8 hours | ~1-2 hours | RIP-qPCR / Gel Shift |
| Peak RISC Association | 24-48 hours | 8-12 hours | Northern Blot |
| Guide Strand Bias (AS:S Ratio) | 3:1 to 5:1 | >10:1 | Radiolabeled Strand Quantification |
| Dependence on CLP1 Kinase | Required | Not Required | Kinase Knockdown Assay |
| Functional IC₅₀ | 1.0 nM | 0.2 nM | Dose-Response (Luciferase) |
Table 2: Key Reagents for RISC Loading Studies
| Reagent/Chemical | Function/Description | Vendor Example (Catalog #) |
|---|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-VP siRNA | Test article; phosphatase-stable 5′-modification | Custom Synthesis (e.g., Dharmacon) |
| Unmodified siRNA (5′-OH) | Control article | Thermo Fisher (AM4624) |
| Anti-Ago2 Antibody | For immunoprecipitation of RISC | MilliporeSigma (07-590) |
| [γ-³²P] ATP | For 5′-radiolabeling of siRNA strands | PerkinElmer (NEG035C) |
| Recombinant hAgo2 Protein | For in vitro RISC reconstitution assays | Origene (TP315002) |
| CLP1 siRNA | To knockdown endogenous kinase activity | Santa Cruz (sc-88933) |
| Dual-Luciferase Reporter System | For functional silencing kinetics | Promega (E1910) |
Protocol 1: Quantitative RISC Loading via Ago2 Immunoprecipitation (RIP-qPCR) Objective: To measure the kinetics and magnitude of siRNA association with endogenous Ago2 over time.
Protocol 2: In Vitro RISC Loading and Strand Bias Assay Objective: To determine guide strand selection bias and loading efficiency in a purified system.
Visualizations
Diagram 1: RISC Loading Pathways for Modified vs. Unmodified siRNA (65 chars)
Diagram 2: RIP-qPCR Workflow for RISC Loading Kinetics (56 chars)
Diagram 3: RISC Maturation with 5'-(E)-VP siRNA (54 chars)
The therapeutic efficacy of siRNA is often hampered by off-target immunostimulation, primarily through the activation of Toll-like Receptors (TLRs). This application note details the assessment of the immunostimulatory profile of novel 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate (5′-E-VP) modified siRNAs, a key component of our broader thesis on improving siRNA drug properties. Understanding and mitigating innate immune recognition is critical for advancing safe, systemic siRNA therapeutics.
siRNA can be recognized by endosomal TLRs (TLR3, TLR7/8) and cytoplasmic sensors (RIG-I, MDA5), leading to IFN-α/β and pro-inflammatory cytokine production.
Diagram 1: siRNA innate immune sensing pathways.
The 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate modification alters the siRNA's phosphate backbone geometry and electrostatic profile. This may interfere with the binding and activation of RNA-sensing PRRs, potentially reducing immunostimulation while maintaining RNAi activity—a primary hypothesis of our thesis.
Table 1: Cytokine Induction by Unmodified vs. 5′-E-VP siRNA in Human PBMCs.
| siRNA Construct (100 nM) | IFN-α (pg/mL) | TNF-α (pg/mL) | IL-6 (pg/mL) | RIG-I Activation (Fold Change) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unmodified siRNA | 1250 ± 210 | 890 ± 145 | 1100 ± 180 | 8.5 ± 1.2 |
| 5′-E-VP Modified siRNA | 85 ± 30 | 120 ± 45 | 95 ± 40 | 1.5 ± 0.4 |
| Negative Control (Scrambled) | < 20 | < 50 | < 50 | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
| Positive Control (Poly(I:C)) | 1800 ± 350 | 1500 ± 220 | 1750 ± 300 | 15.2 ± 2.5 |
Table 2: TLR7/8 HEK-Blue Reporter Assay Response (OD 650nm).
| siRNA Construct (500 nM) | TLR7 Response | TLR8 Response |
|---|---|---|
| Unmodified GU-rich siRNA | 1.25 ± 0.15 | 0.95 ± 0.12 |
| 5′-E-VP Modified Version | 0.32 ± 0.08 | 0.28 ± 0.07 |
| ssRNA40 (TLR7 agonist) | 2.10 ± 0.20 | - |
| ssRNA41 (TLR8 agonist) | - | 1.85 ± 0.18 |
| Medium Only | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.02 |
Objective: To quantify innate cytokine response to 5′-E-VP siRNA. Workflow Diagram:
Diagram 2: PBMC cytokine profiling workflow.
Materials & Reagents:
Procedure:
Objective: To dissect endosomal TLR activation by 5′-E-VP siRNA. Workflow Diagram:
Diagram 3: TLR7/8 reporter assay workflow.
Materials & Reagents:
Procedure:
Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Immunostimulatory Profiling.
| Reagent/Material | Supplier (Example) | Function in Assay |
|---|---|---|
| Ficoll-Paque PLUS | Cytiva | Density gradient medium for isolation of viable human PBMCs. |
| Lipofectamine RNAiMAX | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cationic lipid reagent for efficient siRNA delivery into immune cells. |
| Human Cytokine 10-Plex Panel | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Multiplex bead-based ELISA for simultaneous quantification of key cytokines (IFN-α, TNF-α, IL-6, etc.). |
| HEK-Blue hTLR7 & hTLR8 Cells | InvivoGen | Engineered reporter cell lines stably expressing human TLR7 or TLR8 and an inducible SEAP gene. |
| QUANTI-Blue SEAP Detection | InvivoGen | Colorimetric detection medium for sensitive quantification of SEAP, indicating TLR activation. |
| High Molecular Weight Poly(I:C) | InvivoGen | Synthetic dsRNA analog, used as a positive control for TLR3/MDA5/RIG-I activation. |
| ssRNA40 / ssRNA41 | InvivoGen | Sequence-specific single-stranded RNA ligands acting as positive controls for human TLR7 and TLR8, respectively. |
| RPMI 1640 + GlutaMAX | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Optimized culture medium for primary immune cells, reducing need for glutamine supplementation. |
Application Notes: Evaluating 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate (5′-E-VP) Modified siRNAs
The integration of 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate (5′-E-VP) into the passenger strand of siRNA duplexes represents a significant advance in enhancing nuclease resistance and modulating RISC loading kinetics. This chemical modification aims to improve pharmacokinetic properties and efficacy, but its multi-step synthesis introduces cost and scalability challenges. This analysis quantifies the trade-offs between the synthetic complexity of 5′-E-VP incorporation and the resultant therapeutic gain in potency and stability.
Table 1: Quantitative Profile of 5′-(E)-VP Modified siRNA
| Parameter | Unmodified siRNA | 5′-(E)-VP Modified siRNA | Measurement/Assay |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relative Synthetic Yield | 100% (Baseline) | 60-75% (per modification step) | HPLC Purification Post-Solid-Phase Synthesis |
| In Vitro Serum Half-life (t₁/₂) | ~0.5 - 2 hours | 24 - 48 hours | Incubation in 90% Human Serum, Gel Electrophoresis |
| RISC Loading Efficiency (Guide Strand) | 100% (Baseline) | 120-150% (Relative Increase) | RISC-Capture Assay (qPCR) |
| IC₅₀ (Target mRNA Knockdown) | 1 nM (Baseline) | 0.1 - 0.3 nM | In Vitro Cell-Based Luciferase Reporter Assay |
| In Vivo Durability of Effect | 3-7 days | 14-28 days (single dose) | Rodent Model, Target mRNA Quantification (RT-qPCR) |
| Estimated Cost of Goods (GMP) | 1x | 3-5x (Projected) | Process Chemistry & Purification Analysis |
Table 2: Cost-Benefit Decision Matrix
| Development Goal | Benefit of 5′-(E)-VP | Complexity/Cost Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Targets Requiring Frequent Dosing | Low | High | Not Justified |
| High Nuclease Environment (e.g., Liver) | Very High | Medium | Highly Recommended |
| Low-Potency Lead Candidate | High (Potency Boost) | High | Consider for Rescue |
| First-in-Class, Rapid Proof-of-Concept | Medium | High | Delay to Later Stage |
| Best-in-Class, Chronic Indication | Very High | Medium-High | Strongly Recommended |
Experimental Protocols
Protocol 1: Solid-Phase Synthesis of 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate Modified Oligonucleotide Objective: Incorporate the 5′-(E)-VP phosphoramidite at the 5′-terminus of the siRNA passenger strand. Materials: Controlled pore glass (CPG) support, standard & 5′-(E)-VP phosphoramidites, oxidizer (0.02M Iodine), deblock solution (3% DCA in DCM), activator (0.25M 5-Ethylthio-1H-tetrazole), cap mix (Acetic Anhydride & N-Methylimidazole). Procedure:
Protocol 2: Serum Stability Assay Objective: Compare nuclease resistance of modified vs. unmodified siRNA. Procedure:
Protocol 3: RISC-Capture Assay for Loading Efficiency Objective: Quantify guide strand incorporation into the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex. Procedure:
Visualizations
Title: Synthesis Cost vs. Therapeutic Gain Flow
Title: 5'-E-VP siRNA Mechanism of Action
The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions
| Reagent/Material | Function in 5′-E-VP siRNA Research |
|---|---|
| 5′-(E)-Vinylphosphonate Phosphoramidite | The specialized building block for solid-phase synthesis, enabling direct incorporation of the 5′-E-VP modification. |
| Anti-Ago2 Magnetic Beads | Critical for immunoprecipitating the RISC complex to analyze guide strand loading efficiency (RISC-Capture Assay). |
| Stem-Loop RT-qPCR Primers | For specific and sensitive quantification of the siRNA guide strand from captured RISC or tissue samples. |
| Ion-Exchange HPLC Columns | Essential for purifying the highly polar 5′-E-VP modified oligonucleotides from failure sequences. |
| Stabilized Human Serum | Provides a standardized, nuclease-rich medium for in vitro serum stability assays under physiological conditions. |
| In Vivo-JetPEI / Lipid Nanoparticles | Delivery vehicles for assessing the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of modified siRNAs in animal models. |
| Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) qPCR Probes | Enable accurate quantification of target mRNA knockdown from in vivo samples with high specificity and sensitivity. |
The 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate modification represents a significant advancement in siRNA medicinal chemistry, offering a superior balance of nuclease resistance, efficient RISC loading, and potent, durable gene silencing. As validated against other 5′ modifications, its robust performance in vivo makes it a critical tool for developing next-generation RNAi therapeutics. Future directions include exploring its combination with other novel chemistries (e.g., GalNAc conjugates, other backbone modifications), further elucidating its detailed interactions within RISC, and expanding its application in challenging therapeutic areas requiring enhanced tissue exposure and potency. This modification is poised to remain a cornerstone in the rational design of clinically viable siRNA drugs.